HC stalls felling of trees until further orders

HC stalls felling of trees until further orders

Headlines


‘A total of 29,946 trees were allowed to be fell in the past three years, which is 27 trees per day’

‘A total of 29,946 trees were allowed to be fell in the past three years, which is 27 trees per day’

The Delhi High Court on Thursday halted the felling of trees in the Capital until further orders, noting there is no other way to mitigate the ecological degradation in the city.

Noting the findings of an affidavit filed by the Deputy Conservator of Forest, Justice Nazmi Waziri said, “A total of 29,946 trees were allowed to be fell in the past three years, which on computation comes to 27 trees per day and 1.13 per hour.” The Judge was hearing a contempt petition filed by Neeraj Sharma, represented by advocate Aditya N Prasad, regarding cutting down fully grown trees in east Delhi’s Vikas Marg.

“It is evident that large scale denudation of fully grown trees only worsens the ecological balance of the city. Air pollution needs to be mitigated on an urgent basis. Trees are a great source for mitigation,” Justice Waziri said, adding, “Surely, there is no other way to mitigate the ecological and environmental degradation in the city.”

Therefore, the Bench said, “in the public interest as well as for the sake of the environment for present and future generations”, tree felling in Delhi will not be not permitted till June 2 — the next hearing date — and it should be ensured that “felling is done only when it is fully assured by the applicant that the trees would at least be transplanted”.

The High Court had, in its April 28 order, asked the Department of Deputy Conservator of Forests (DCF) to submit in an affidavit the number of trees permitted to be cut down over the last three years. In its affidavit, the Deputy Conservator of Forest had stated that 13,490 trees were permitted to be cut in the city and 16,456 trees were directed to be transplanted in the years 2019, 2020, and 2021.

The High Court had earlier sought an explanation from a Tree Officer over the permission given to cut down a fully grown tree, noting it was the officer’s duty to ensure trees are not allowed to be cut “needlessly or wantonly”.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *